Pakistan Warns Against India’s Arms Deal With Russia

FM says anti-missile system encourages misadventure

Image Credits: Vitaly V. Kuzmin, Wikimedia Commons.

India’s purchase of Russian S-400 air defense systems, via a deal signed last year and worth $5.43 billion, has unnerved Pakistan, with Foreign minister Shah Mohammed Qureshi describing the S-400s as destabilizing weapon systems which could affect the region’s strategic stability. Delivery of the first S-400 system is likely to take place in 2020.

New Delhi (Sputnik): Expressing his apprehension about the arms purchase by India, Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mohammed Qureshi has called on global powers to be “mindful” of their responsibility in terms of arms supplies to the region.

“The introduction of new destabilizing weapon systems, such as the S-400 anti-ballistic missile system, could further accentuate challenges to strategic stability. They can encourage a misadventure by an adversary, under a false sense of security,” FM Shah Mohammed Qureshi said on Wednesday in Islamabad.

Last October, India inked a $5.43 billion defense contract with Russia to purchase of five S-400 air defense systems despite the threat of US sanctions. Pakistan has immediately reacted by claiming that the purchase “is a part of their efforts to acquire a Ballistic Missile Defence (BMD) System through multiple sources,” adding that the move could destabilize strategic stability in South Asia.
India has denied the accusations, deeming the purchase as necessary for national security.


Alex Jones breaks down how the crisis in Venezuela could trigger a world war.

India’s massive acquisition of conventional arms coupled with offensive doctrines, such as Cold Start, and its expansion of strategic assets, including nuclear submarines, are developments with serious security implications for Pakistan and the region, Qureshi opined.

He also mentioned that the recent ASAT test conducted by India on 27 March raised concerns in Islamabad. Qureshi warned the international community against providing concessions and sharing high-end technology with India.

“The country-specific exemption by the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), has had negative implications for strategic stability in our region,” Qureshi stated.

Qureshi urged global powers to remain mindful while dealing with countries in the region as the strategic stability of South Asia is impacted not only by regional developments but also by the approach of the international community.

(Photo by Соколрус / Wiki)

As per the foreign minister, Pakistan had demonstrated its commitment to peace and stability by putting forward a proposal for a Strategic Restraint Regime (SRR) — based on three interlocking elements of conflict resolution: nuclear restraint, missile restraint and conventional balance. He said the proposal remains on the table and if pursued could lay the foundation for lasting peace and stability in the region.

The crisis between the two nuclear-armed nations escalated after the Pulwama terrorist attack in which 40 Indian soldiers were killed. Tensions were further heightened on 27 February when the two air forces got embroiled in a dogfight — their first ever in the last five decades — in retaliation to a “non-military pre-emptive” air strike conducted by the Indian Air Force against apparent terror infrastructure in Pakistan’s Balakot on 26 February.

Pakistan claimed that it shot down two Indian fighter jets in the dogfight, while India refuted the claim and said that the second downed fighter jet was a F-16 of the Pakistan Air Force which was shot down by an IAF MiG-21 Bison.


Owen breaks down how House Democrats were no match for Candice Owens because she’s authentic and they are not.