Were COVID-19 Vaccines Made To “Self-Spread” To Non-Vaccinated People?

Johns Hopkins promoted the idea and Pfizer mentioned potential risks during trials

Image Credits: infowars.

Documents from Pfizer, Johns Hopkins and others discuss the potential for COVID-19 vaccines to “self-spread” to non-vaccinated individuals coming in contact with a recently vaccinated person.

In fact, a 2018 report by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Center for Health Security floated the idea of using this type of vaccine to intentionally spread to others for “protection” against disease.

Under the section, “Self-Spreading Vaccines,” the Johns Hopkins document states, “Selfspreading vaccines are genetically engineered to move through populations like communicable diseases, but rather than causing disease, they confer protection. The vision is that a small number of individuals in a target population could be vaccinated, and the vaccine strain would then circulate in the population much like a pathogenic virus, resulting in rapid, widespread immunity.”

The paper admits self-spreading vaccines being implemented would come with challenges, such as “informed consent” and potentially life-threatening contraindications.

“The ethical and regulatory challenges surrounding informed consent and prevention and monitoring of adverse events would be critical challenges to implementing this approach even in an extreme event,” the document states.

The Johns Hopkins report also noted, “There is a not insignificant risk of the vaccine virus reverting to wild-type virulence, as has sometimes occurred with the oral polio vaccine.”

A Pfizer placebo-controlled COVID-19 vaccine safety study similarly describes the potential for the shot to cause adverse effects in people in close contact with recently vaccinated individuals.

However, in the Pfizer study self-spreading is discussed as an unintentional possibility that could cause harm.

Under the section “Occupational Exposure,” the Pfizer study explains, “An occupational exposure occurs when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care.”

The “study intervention” being referred to is a person who recently received the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine as part of the study, and an “AE” is an adverse event or bad reaction.

The document warns under a section called “Exposure During Pregnancy” that if “A female family member or healthcare provider reports that she is pregnant after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact,” the exposure should be reported within 24 hours.

Another way someone could be exposed is if “A male participant who is receiving or has discontinued study intervention exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.”

Pfizer even described a scenario where “A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to
or around the time of conception.”

Watch the following segment from Infowars’ morning call-in program The American Journal for a more in-depth conversation about the Pfizer document.

A September 2020 article by post-doctoral researcher Guy Reeves and Dr. Filippa Lentzos, a top social scientist from Norway, was sarcastically titled, “Scientists are working on vaccines that spread like a disease. What could possibly go wrong?”

In the piece, Lentzos poses the question, “What if instead of orchestrating complicated and resource-intensive campaigns to vaccinate humans against emerging infectious diseases like COVID-19, we could instead stop the zoonotic diseases that sometimes leap from animals to people at their source?”

“A small, but growing number of scientists think it’s possible to exploit the self-propagating properties of viruses and use them to spread immunity instead of disease,” Lentzos wrote.

She says scientists have been experimenting with such self-spreading vaccines for at least 20 years already and that the research has gained the attention of the US military.

According to Lentzos, self-spreading vaccines have roots in depopulation efforts aimed at culling pest populations.

“Australian researchers described a virally spread immunocontraception, which hijacked the immune systems of infected animals—in this case a non-native mouse species in Australia—and prevented them from fertilizing offspring,” the article explains.

Next, the article presents possible nefarious uses for self-spreading vaccines, for example, “You could engineer triggers into a virus that cause immune system failures in infected people or animals, a bit like HIV does naturally. Or you could create triggers in a virus that cause a harmful autoimmune response, where the body starts attacking its own healthy cells and tissues.”

One reason the military is interested in the technology is that it could be used to create a dangerous bioweapon.

One example provided is a human anti-fertility vaccine, an idea floated in South Africa’s Project Coast.

Now, tens of thousands of women around the globe are reporting abnormal menstrual cycles, miscarriages and other health issues after being near recently vaccinated individuals.

Is this a sign the current COVID-19 vaccines are spreading and causing adverse events in the unvaccinated population, and if so, was it intentional or accidental?

Former Pfizer Vice President and Chief Science Officer Dr. Michael Yeadon recently said he thinks vaccines “will be used for mass depopulation.”

“It’s my considered view that it is entirely possible that this will be used for massive-scale depopulation,” he said.

Speaking with LifeSite News reporter Patrick Delaney, Yeadon said, “If you wanted to introduce a characteristic which could be harmful and could even be lethal, and you can even tune it to say ‘let’s put it in some gene that will cause liver injury over a nine-month period,’ or, cause your kidneys to fail but not until you encounter this kind of organism [that would be quite possible]. Biotechnology provides you with limitless ways, frankly, to injure or kill billions of people.”

A woman called Leila Centner in Miami, Florida co-founded a private school that made nationwide headlines this week for telling teachers recently vaccinated for COVID-19 to stay away from students because they “may transmit something” to them.

The story made it to White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki when CBS reporter Ed O’keefe asked for the Biden administration’s comment on the situation.

Psaki regurgitated some talking points and said the vaccines are made “to keep children safe, keep parents safe, keep teachers safe.”

To summarize what’s really going on with this whole COVID-19 vaccine situation, watch this clip of The Alex Jones Show where the complex biological attack on humanity is explained.

Also, watch Infowars’ latest special report on vaccine shedding below: